Official cryptoapi? Define official.
> ...otherwise this may render the kerneli.org/cryptoapi effort completely
> useless :-/ ...of course, if it's your long term goal to take the
> cryptoapi development away from kerneli.org, I'd like to know too ;-)
kerneli.org/cryptoapi _is_ useless joke for many needs. Fortunately other
people are able to see the limitations/sillyness of kerneli.org/cryptoapi:
1) You are trying to replace link/insmod time overhead with runtime
overhead + unnecessary bloat.
2) No direct link access to low level cipher functions or higher level
functions.
3) No clean way to replace cipher code with processor type optimized
assembler implementations.
Regards,
Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@pp.inet.fi>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/