I'd love to hear any good or bad results you have with these
patches.
Thanks!
Dave Olien
Open Source Developement Lab
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:28:07PM -0400, Kevin Brosius wrote:
> >
> > looking at that i realise that DAC960 code in 2.5.43
> > is not supposed to be tested:
> > ======
> > #error I am a non-portable driver, please convert me to use the Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt interfaces
> > ======
> > am i right?
> >
> > the following weirdo appears in both gcc-3.1 and 3.2 (also in 2.5.42)
> > ======
> > drivers/block/DAC960.c: In function `DAC960_DetectControllers':
> > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: `Controller' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > drivers/block/DAC960.c:2465: for each function it appears in.)
> >
>
> Yes, 2.5.42 did this also. It looks like gcc 3.2 doesn't like goto's
> which reference variables outside their native scope. You can move the
> Controller definition to full function scope to fix that error.
>
> The DAC960 doesn't seem usable out of the stock kernel build though.
> You'll need to try patches previously posted to the list. (Which don't
> fully work for me either...)
>
> --
> Kevin
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/