Re: [RFC] Rename _bh to _softirq
Maksim (maxk@qualcomm.com)
Tue, 15 Oct 2002 09:34:02 -0700
At 05:57 AM 10/15/2002 +0400, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
>Hello!
>
> > But yes, i agree, and there are a number of other
> > renames that would make perfect sense.
>
>Oh, do you dislike names with history? I love them. :-)
>Well, bh is short, looks nice and cryptic enough.
>
>After true BHs have gone, just say that "bh" is alias for "softirq".
Sure. Just like I said we can keep compatibility defines
#define local_bh_disable local_softirq_disable
But primary interface should be changed IMO.
Max
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/