Re: New BK License Problem?
Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Sat, 5 Oct 2002 17:53:49 -0700
> > > A fix for this would be "make patches available from bkbits.net".
> >
> > bkbits.net is a free service. [snip good arguments]
>
> > But as I said to someone else, why doesn't someone register
> > "nobkbits.net" and use BK to mirror the repos and then provide the
> > tarballs/patches as you see fit.
>
> I can do this on NL.linux.org. I'm already doing it for the
> 2.4 and 2.5 Linux kernel trees and am willing to run the script
> for other bitkeeper trees too.
>
> If people want it, just let me know.
If this turns into a serious thing we could polish up the bkbits.net
infrastructure and provide it with one extra URL that lets you get
gnu style patches. I already have the code for this, I just have it
disabled for bandwidth reasons.
--
---
Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/