Re: Why does x86_64 support a SuSE-specific ioctl?
Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
05 Oct 2002 14:20:43 +0100
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 05:35, Andi Kleen wrote:
> */
> diff -urN linux-2.4.18.tmp/include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h linux-2.4.18.SuSE/include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h
> --- linux-2.4.18.tmp/include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h Sat May 4 11:37:28 2002
> +++ linux-2.4.18.SuSE/include/asm-alpha/ioctls.h Sat May 4 11:37:56 2002
> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@
> #define TIOCGSID 0x5429 /* Return the session ID of FD */
> #define TIOCGPTN _IOR('T',0x30, unsigned int) /* Get Pty Number (of pty-mux device) */
> #define TIOCSPTLCK _IOW('T',0x31, int) /* Lock/unlock Pty */
> +#define TIOCGDEV _IOR('T',0x32, unsigned int) /* Get real dev no below /dev/console */
>
Shouldn't these values be reserved in 2.5 before anything goes into 2.4
for this - the values finally used might be different
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/