> You do know that there *is* open source code which is not
> contained in the Linux kernel ;)
I think the fact that downloading the kernel source, applying a patch,
fixing the conflicts, and rebooting, can be a significant PITA for
admin/developers has completely passed them by.
> development kernels only), because the symbol is no longer
> exported and no registration procedure was provided for
> registering otherwise non-implemented system calls (in
> particular the UNIX98 and iBCS/ABI standard putmsg/getmsg
> calls).
Look, why don't you submit the module-loading patch for LiS already ?
Btw, anybody know what the BKL is actually protecting against in
sys_nfsservctl ?
> And what about AFS? I see that it uses a sys_ni_syscall slot as
> well...
I thought it got fixed last time round.
regards
john
-- "Me and my friends are so smart, we invented this new kind of art: Post-modernist throwing darts" - the Moldy Peaches - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/