Re: [OT] 2.6 not 3.0 - (WAS Re: [PATCH-RFC] 4 of 4 - New problem

[Greg KH]

On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:33:58AM +0100, [e-mail] wrote:
> > > Hmmm, then for 3.0 I'd vote for fully working and proven stable:
> > 
> > Hm, how do you "prove" any of these are stable :)
> 
> Hmm, yeah, I see what you mean, but for me, proved stable is a couple
> of years of being in a major distribution, with people actually using
> it.

Ah, so no one actually uses those things in your list.  So glad to hear
that...

> > > * USB (2)
> > 
> > Present in 2.5 (and 2.4 now too)
> 
> ..and yet there are still complaints that it doesn't work every day on the list.

Hm, must have missed those.  I haven't seen any USB 2.0 complaints in
quite some time.  The majority of USB "issues" are crappy usb storage
devices that don't match the USB storage spec, or PCI IRQ routing
problems.

But hey, no one cares about USB, I'm used to it :)

greg k-h