Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend)

[Alan Cox]

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 23:29, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> Sounds like a good reason to do the cleanup immediately, then.
> Deleting code, I can do that ;-)

Absolutely - taking the core EVMS(say the core code and the bits to do
LVM1) and polishing them up to be good clean citizens without code
duplication and other weirdness would be a superb start for EVMS as a
merge candidate. The rest can follow a piece at a time once the core is
right if EVMS is the right path