Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend)

[Alan Cox]

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 15:54, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> I'd be fine if someone said "We'll have EVMS, md and DM in 2.6 and then sort
> the mess in 2.7.", I'm just curious what the goal is. Right now, there's no
> working code in 2.5 nor a vision, which is obviously a major bug.

Look at history - if such a mess got in, it would never get sorted.