Re: [STUPID TESTCASE] ext3 htree vs. reiserfs on 2.5.40-mm1

Andreas Dilger (adilger@clusterfs.com)
Wed, 2 Oct 2002 10:54:54 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Dave McCracken: "Re: [PATCH] Snapshot of shared page tables"
Previous message: jbradford@dial.pipex.com: "Re: [PATCH] Bodge up serial support in 2.5.40"

On Oct 02, 2002 14:48 +0400, Paul P Komkoff Jr wrote:
> Unfortunately, there still one issue in ext3. It called "inode limit".
> Initially I wanted to run this test on 1000000 files but ... I hit
> inode limit and don't want to increase it artificially yet.
>
> Reiserfs worked fine because it don't have such kind of limit ...

We have plans to fix this already, but it is not high enough on anyones
priority list quite yet (most filesystems have enough inodes for regular
usage).

Cheers, Andreas

-- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Dave McCracken: "Re: [PATCH] Snapshot of shared page tables"
Previous message: jbradford@dial.pipex.com: "Re: [PATCH] Bodge up serial support in 2.5.40"