Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend)

EVMS is powerfull, but actually has a so ugly command line...
fortunatelly EVMS architecture command line could be exchanged...

On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Matthias Andree wrote:

> Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 21:12:49 +0200
> From: Matthias Andree <[e-mail]>
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: Dave Jones <[e-mail]>, [e-mail],
>      Alexander Viro <[e-mail]>,
>      Joe Thornber <[e-mail]>,
>      Linus Torvalds <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend)
>
> On Tue, 01 Oct 2002, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 04:52:44PM +0200, [e-mail] wrote:
> >  > A Logical Volume Manager is needed on Unix servers, and so it is needed
> >  > also on Linux.
> >  > If this LVM is obsoleted, then when will LVM2 be merged?
> >  > really we cannot have a 2.6 or 3.0 tree without a Volume Manager, it would
> >  > be a big fault.
> >
> > No-one suggested 2.6.0 shipping without /something/, but having a dead
> > LVM1 in _2.5_ doesn't help anyone. We've gone 6 months with it being in
> > a broken/uncompilable state, going another month without it isn't a big
> > deal. Getting something in before halloween is however a goal the
> > Sistina folks should be aiming for.
>
> How about EVMS kernel-space merge instead?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>