Re: [PATCH] accessfs v0.6 ported to 2.5.35-lsm1 - 1/2
Chris Wright (chris@wirex.com)
Mon, 30 Sep 2002 01:22:00 -0700
* James Morris (jmorris@intercode.com.au) wrote:
> >
> > As for the ip_prot_sock hook in general, does it look ok to the other
> > developers?
>
> This hook is not necessary: any related access control decision can be
> made via the more generic and flexible socket_bind() hook (like SELinux).
Yes, I had the same impression.
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/