Re: 2.5.39-mm1

[Martin J. Bligh]

> I must say that based on a small amount of performance testing the
> benefits of the cache warmness thing are disappointing. Maybe 1% if
> you squint.  Martin, could you please do a before-and-after on the
> NUMAQ's, double check that it is actually doing the right thing?

Seems to work just fine:

2.5.38-mm1 + my original hot/cold code.
Elapsed: 19.798s User: 191.61s System: 43.322s CPU: 1186.4%

2.5.39-mm1
Elapsed: 19.532s User: 192.25s System: 42.642s CPU: 1203.2%

And it's a lot more than 1% for me ;-) About 12% of systime
on kernel compile, IIRC.

M.