Re: [patch] smptimers, old BH removal, tq-cleanup, 2.5.39

[Jeff Garzik]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yes, wrt. keventd i was thinking along the same line - but in a different,
> perhaps cleaner and simpler direction.
> 
> i'd like to introduce the following interfaces:
> 
> 	- create_work_queue(wq, handler_fn)

what is handler_fn for, if you pass work_fn later?

> 	- destroy_work_queue(wq)
> 
> 	- queue_work(wq, work_fn, work_data)

queue_work_delayed(wq, work_fn, work_data, delay) would be nice too

> 	- flush_work_queue(wq)
> 
> this is an extension of the keventd concept. A work queue is a simplified
> interface to create a kernel thread that gets work queued from IRQ and
> process contexts. No more, no less.

Your proposal sounds good to me...

	Jeff