Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86 BIOS Enhanced Disk Device (EDD) polling
Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
29 Sep 2002 17:44:59 +0100
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 17:11, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 04:30:29PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > arch/i386/kernel/edd.c | 522 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.c | 6
> > arch/i386/kernel/setup.c | 20 +
>
> Something that's been bothering me for a while, has been the
> proliferation of 'driver' type things appearing in arch/i386/kernel/
> My initial thought was to move the various CPU related 'drivers'
> (msr,cpuid,bluesmoke,microcode) to arch/i386/cpu/ [1]
> but I'm now wondering if an arch/i386/driver/ would be a better alternative.
>
> Opinions?
Thats even more prevalent in things like the unmerged bits of the mips
tree. A lot of embedded processors have on chip everything - eg look at
the cirrus logic ARM chips or the Etrax.
The extra people use arch/foo/drivers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/