Re: [RFC] LSM changes for 2.5.38

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:09:02PM -0400, [e-mail] wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:55:10 BST, Christoph Hellwig said:
> 
> > And WTF is the use a security policy that checks module arguments?  Do
> > you want to disallow options that are quotes from books on the index
> > or not political correct enough for a US state agency?
> 
> How about a security policy that says:
> 
> 1) Thou mayest do an 'modprobe wvlan_cs'
> 
> 2) Thou mayest not do 'modprobe wvlan_cs eth=0'.
> 
> 'eth=0' causes it to create the interface as 'wvlan0' 'wvlan1' etc rather
> than 'eth0', 'eth1', etc.  This makes a difference if you have iptables
> rules that say '-i eth+' or '-i wvlan+' that implement different rulesets
> for wireless and hard-wired connections.

So I have to download the driver source and change the parameter
to i_m_to_fscking_intelligent_for_the_nsa_eth=0?