This patch has problems.
    
   @@ -1626,24 +1635,32 @@
    		for (ifp=inet6_addr_lst[i]; ifp; ifp=ifp->lst_next) {
    			unsigned long age;
    
   -			if (ifp->flags & IFA_F_PERMANENT)
   +			spin_lock(&ifp->lock);
   +			if (ifp->flags & IFA_F_PERMANENT) {
   +				spin_unlock(&ifp->lock);
    				continue;
   +			}
This is completely unnecessary.  Nobody modifies the
IFA_F_PERMANENT flag after the addr entry has been added
to the hash table and this runs under the addrconf hash
lock already.
Alexey will have to comment on the rest.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/