noload:
Kernel Time CPU Ratio
2.4.19 72.21 99% 1.00
2.5.38 73.56 99% 1.02
2.5.38-mm2 73.88 99% 1.02
2.5.38-mm3 74.10 99% 1.03
process_load:
Kernel Time CPU Ratio
2.4.19 88.02 80% 1.22
2.5.38 77.44 94% 1.07
2.5.38-mm2 77.88 94% 1.08
2.5.38-mm3 77.94 94% 1.08
io_load:
Kernel Time CPU Ratio
2.4.19 170.06 45% 2.36
2.5.38 283.27 28% 3.92
2.5.38-mm2 106 75% 1.47*
2.5.38-mm3 95.9 84% 1.33*
mem_load:
Kernel Time CPU Ratio
2.4.19 100.52 78% 1.39
2.5.38 116.94 67% 1.62
2.5.38-mm2 105 74% 1.45
2.5.38-mm3 109 73% 1.50
IO load and mem_load results are averages of n=5 runs. The difference between
io_loads of mm2 and mm3 is statistically significant (p=0.022) but not mem_load.
Con.
P.S. For those who just want more info :-P
Hardware: 1133Mhz PIII, 256Mb Ram, IDE ATA5 5400rpm HD, IO load on same disk,
reiserFS
Statistics assuming normal distribution curve:
mm2:
Hi = 126. Low = 92.1
Mean = 106.
95% confidence interval for Mean: 87.52 thru 124.6
Standard Deviation = 14.9
Median = 103.
Average Absolute Deviation from Median = 11.5
mm3:
Hi = 107. Low = 82.1
Mean = 95.9
95% confidence interval for Mean: 80.51 thru 111.4
Standard Deviation = 12.4
Median = 101.
Average Absolute Deviation from Median = 9.64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/