Re: [BENCHMARK] fork_load module tested for contest

[Con Kolivas]

Quoting Cliff White <[e-mail]>:
> > 
> > I've been trialling a new load module for the contest benchmark
> > (http://contest.kolivas.net) which simply forks a process that does
> nothing,
> > waits for it to die, then repeats. Here are the results I have obtained so
> far:
> > 
> > noload:
> > Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
> > 2.4.19                  72.90           99%             1.00
> > 2.4.19-ck7              71.55           100%            0.98
> > 2.5.38                  73.86           99%             1.01
> > 2.5.38-mm2              73.93           99%             1.01
> > 
> > fork_load:
> > Kernel                  Time            CPU             Ratio
> > 2.4.19                  100.05          69%             1.37
> > 2.4.19-ck7              74.65           95%             1.02
> > 2.5.38                  77.35           95%             1.06
> > 2.5.38-mm2              76.99           95%             1.06
> > 
> > ck7 uses O1, preempt, low latency
> > Preempt=N for all other kernels
> > 
> > Clearly you can see the 2.5 kernels have a substantial lead over the
> current
> > stable kernel.
> > 
> > This load module is not part of the contest package yet. I could
> certainly
> > change it to fork n processes but I'm not really sure just how many n
> should be.
> 
> I think for OSDL/STP, it would be nice if n == number of CPU's, so maybe make
> 
> 'n' an arg?

Ok. I was more interested to know if maybe thousands of processes or something
like that would be interesting.

> When you say the process 'does nothing', what do you mean? It forks, then the
> 
> child does exit() ?

Yes the child forked execs nil.c which is basically return 0

Con