this requirement even makes some sense - the group of threads who own a
lock really own all rights to the lock as well.
the attached patch against BK-curr fixes this, all testcases pass now.
(inter-process testcases as well, which are not affected by this patch.)
(SIGURG and SIGIO semantics should also continue to work - there's some
more stuff we can optimize with the new pidhash in this area, but that's
for later.)
Ingo
--- linux/fs/locks.c.orig Wed Sep 25 10:28:26 2002
+++ linux/fs/locks.c Wed Sep 25 10:28:41 2002
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
return -ENOMEM;
fl->fl_file = filp;
- fl->fl_pid = current->pid;
+ fl->fl_pid = current->tgid;
fl->fl_flags = (cmd & LOCK_NB) ? FL_FLOCK : FL_FLOCK | FL_SLEEP;
fl->fl_type = type;
fl->fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
fl->fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
fl->fl_owner = current->files;
- fl->fl_pid = current->pid;
+ fl->fl_pid = current->tgid;
fl->fl_file = filp;
fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
fl->fl_notify = NULL;
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
fl->fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
fl->fl_owner = current->files;
- fl->fl_pid = current->pid;
+ fl->fl_pid = current->tgid;
fl->fl_file = filp;
fl->fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
fl->fl_notify = NULL;
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@
return -ENOMEM;
fl->fl_owner = current->files;
- fl->fl_pid = current->pid;
+ fl->fl_pid = current->tgid;
fl->fl_file = filp;
fl->fl_flags = FL_LEASE;
@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@
int error;
fl.fl_owner = current->files;
- fl.fl_pid = current->pid;
+ fl.fl_pid = current->tgid;
fl.fl_file = filp;
fl.fl_flags = FL_POSIX | FL_ACCESS | FL_SLEEP;
fl.fl_type = (read_write == FLOCK_VERIFY_WRITE) ? F_WRLCK : F_RDLCK;
@@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@
*before = fl;
list_add(&fl->fl_link, &file_lock_list);
- error = f_setown(filp, current->pid, 1);
+ error = f_setown(filp, current->tgid, 1);
out_unlock:
unlock_kernel();
return error;
@@ -1632,7 +1632,7 @@
lock.fl_start = 0;
lock.fl_end = OFFSET_MAX;
lock.fl_owner = owner;
- lock.fl_pid = current->pid;
+ lock.fl_pid = current->tgid;
lock.fl_file = filp;
if (filp->f_op && filp->f_op->lock != NULL) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/