Re: [BENCHMARK] Corrected gcc3.2 v gcc2.95.3 contest results
Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Mon, 23 Sep 2002 06:47:31 -0600
On Mon Sep 23, 2002 at 08:30:21PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> Yes you make a very valid point and something I've been stewing over privately
> for some time. contest runs benchmarks in a fixed order with a "priming" compile
> to try and get pagecaches etc back to some sort of baseline (I've been trying
> hard to make the results accurate and repeatable).
It would sure be nice for this sortof test if there were
some sort of a "flush-all-caches" syscall...
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/