On Sat, 21 Sep 2002 06:42, David Brownell wrote:
> >>I wasn't joking about putting back the /proc/bus/usb/drivers file. This
> >> is really going to hurt us in 2.6.
>
> Considering that the main use of that file that I know about was
> implicit (usbfs is available if its files are present, another
> assumption broken in 2.5), I'm not sure I feel any pain... :-)
OK. Everytime someone goes "I've got usbfs loaded, and here is
/proc/bus/usb/devices, but can't send you /proc/bus/usb/drivers", I'll assume
that you two will answer the question.
Helping people is hard. Please don't make it harder. :-(
Brad
- --
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9i63BW6pHgIdAuOMRAmylAKCFgC9OMHhzzLT9ac+Z+YHSNkn0IACeJsCe
MxFG9+07RZh1QnDAE27/FqI=
=vwfj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/