Re: FW: 2.5.34: IR __FUNCTION__ breakage

[Jean Tourrilhes]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:41:38PM +0100, Neil Booth wrote:
> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:-
> 
> > > > Also, specifically relating to varargs macros as described above, you
> > > > can certainly have a varargs macro with zero args, just look at C99
> > > > varargs macros...
> > >
> > > 	I remember that it didn't work. Ok, I'll try again.
> > 
> > if I remember corretly with C99 if you do s.th. like this (simple
> > sample):
> > 
> > #define LOG(level, format, ...)					\
> >                 log(level, format, ##__VA_ARGS__);
> 
> No, this is only valid C99 if __VA_ARGS__ is the empty list.
> 
> I posted the correct way to write this macro about a week ago that
> works with all versions of GCC (and follows their documented
> behaviour; this stuff *is* all documented).
> 
> Neil.

	Err... Can you point me to your post ?

	Jean