Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode()

Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Fri, 20 Sep 2002 22:21:22 +0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Marc Zyngier: "[PATCH] Missing mii.o in driver/net/Makefile"
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "2.4.19, 2.4.20pre7, problem with aic7xxx driver"
Maybe in reply to: Nikita Danilov: "locking rules for ->dirty_inode()"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode()"

You might ask the SGI guys what they do. I know that they have a
systematic approach to documenting lock ordering.

Hans

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Marc Zyngier: "[PATCH] Missing mii.o in driver/net/Makefile"
Previous message: Stephan von Krawczynski: "2.4.19, 2.4.20pre7, problem with aic7xxx driver"
Maybe in reply to: Nikita Danilov: "locking rules for ->dirty_inode()"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: locking rules for ->dirty_inode()"