Great! Where does this leave NGPT though? I had assumed that
this was going to be the next pthread implementation in glibc.
also:
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: glibc threading performance
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 10:42:42 +0100
From: Padraig Brady <padraig.brady@corvil.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Hey guys,
I noticed you're looking at threading stuff lately,
and was wondering about this thread:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-glibc/2001-12/msg00048.html
In summary wouldn't it be better to have a per process
flag that was only set when pthread_create() is called.
If the flag is not set, then you don't need to do locking.
This locking seems to have huge overhead. For e.g. I
patched uniq in textutils to use getc_unlocked() rather
than getc() and got a 300% performance increase!
cheers,
Pádraig.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/