On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 02:49, Greg KH wrote:
> The main reason is this information is no longer available to the USB
> core. It isn't keeping a list of registered drivers anymore, only the
> driver core is. So there's no way that usbfs can get to that
> information. As the info is available in driverfs, duplication of it in
> usbfs would be bloat.
This doesn't follow. driverfs != driver core, just as usbfs != USB core.
I wasn't joking about putting back the /proc/bus/usb/drivers file. This is
really going to hurt us in 2.6.
Brad
- --
http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9ijn3W6pHgIdAuOMRAmU+AKCFhvEl2SmXYiYpOQk6CDWrpZhpSACgwh3p
nczKbUd5dYb1V2Ycbk2/eRE=
=RLuK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/