Re: [PATCH] In-kernel module loader 1/7

[Alan Cox]

On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 19:38, Greg KH wrote:
> And with a LSM module, how can it answer that?  There's no way, unless
> we count every time someone calls into our module.  And if you do that,
> no one will even want to use your module, given the number of hooks, and
> the paths those hooks are on (the speed hit would be horrible.)

So the LSM module always says no. Don't make other modules suffer