Re: [BENCHMARK] contest results for 2.5.36
Daniel Phillips (phillips@arcor.de)
Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:05:41 +0200
On Wednesday 18 September 2002 18:50, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > > No Load:
> > > Kernel Time CPU
> > > 2.4.19 68.14 99%
> > > 2.4.20-pre7 68.11 99%
> > > 2.5.34 69.88 99%
> > > 2.4.19-ck7 68.40 98%
> > > 2.4.19-ck7-rmap 68.73 99%
> > > 2.4.19-cc 68.37 99%
> > > 2.5.36 69.58 99%
> >
> > page_add/remove_rmap. Be interesting to test an Alan kernel too.
>
> Yes, but why are page_add/remove_rmap slower in 2.5 than in
> Con's -rmap kernel ? ;)
I don't know what you guys are going on about, these differences are
getting close to statistically insignificant.
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/