I really think the test is correct, and if we revert it now, we certainly
won't be able to re-introduce it later when we're closer to 2.6.
So if the in_atomic() change is enough to fix everything but do_exit(),
then how about just making do_exit() use PREEMPT_ACTIVE instead?
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/