It's the same, save for a few lines of code that use the local APIC's task
priority HW to try for some better dynamic interrupt balancing.
> > - I believe the way forward here is to work with James Bottomley,
> > who has a nice abstraction of the areas your patch touches for
> > his Voyager sub-architecture.
>
> For 2.5 maybe not for 2.4. Until Linus takes the subarch stuff the
> if if if bits will just get uglier. As well as voyager there are at least
> two more pending NUMA x86 platforms other than IBM summit
> -
I'll have to read up on James Bottomley's x86 subarch code.
-- James Cleverdon IBM xSeries Linux Solutions {jamesclv(Unix, preferred), cleverdj(Notes)} at us dot ibm dot com- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/