Re: [2.5] DAC960

[Alan Cox]

On Sun, 2002-09-15 at 05:21, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> A somewhat curt reply, it could be seen as a brush-off.  I believe the
> whole story goes something like this: the scsi system is a festering
> sore on the whole and eventually needs to be rationalized.  But until
> that happens, we should basically just keep nursing along the various
> drivers that should be using a generic interface, until there really
> is a generic interface around worth putting in the effort to port to.

DAC960 doesn't present a scsi interface to the higher levels. Its
abstraction truely is block based, like i2o_block, like aacraid, like
many other cards.