Re: LTP Nightly BK Test Failure

Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:10:36 -0700

On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:40:03AM -0500, Paul Larson wrote:
> This bk tree covered up to cset 1.523.1.3 and there were several e100

Because revisions in BK change if there is parallel development, it's
far more effective if you list a changeset as either

bk changes -r1.523.1.3
i.e.,
ChangeSet@1.523.1.3, 2002-08-27 18:29:55-07:00, fdavis@si.rr.com
[PATCH] drivers/media/video/bt819.c

Here's the bt819 i2c-old --> i2c patch.

or as the revision and the key,

bk prs -hr1.523.1.3 -nd':I: (:KEY:)'
i.e.,
1.523.1.3 (fdavis@si.rr.com|ChangeSet|20020828012955|42356)

You can use the key any place you can use the revision, like so

bk changes -r'fdavis@si.rr.com|ChangeSet|20020828012955|42356'

-- 

---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/