So it's not preempt. It's not devfs. So now we have to face the fact
that it's either a hardware conflict that linux cannot handle or a
device driver bug.
Any other suggestions?
Now that i'm down to vanilla 2.4.19 perhaps it's time for some real
tests?
On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 05:16, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-08-18 at 05:10, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 18 Aug 2002, Ed Sweetman wrote:
> >
> > > (overview written in hindsight of writing email)
> > > I ran all these tests on ide/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part1
> >
> > Don't be silly - if you want to test anything, devfs is the last thing
> > you want on the system.
> >
> >
>
>
> OK, i can remove devfs, but I dont really see how that would make dma
> transfers (memory) become corrupted and pio mode transfers (memory) to
> not.
>
> I'm going to remove it, but i dont see how it's going to affect what's
> going on.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/