> I'm thinking of changing urandom read to avoid pulling entropy from
> the primary pool (via xfer) if it falls below a given low
> watermark. The important part is to prevent starvation of
> /dev/random, it doesn't have to be fair.
A watermark (perhaps /proc configurable) is a very sane way of doing
this. Great.
> My patches should provide sufficient entropy for any workstation use
> with or without network sampling. It's only the headless case that's
> problematic - see my compromise patch with trust_pct.
Sounds good to me, so we shall see...
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/