Agreed; futexes are lovely because they are so generic.
> By doing the TID-release notification via a futex the actual format of
> the lock is forced, which is a cleanliness problem. Just writing $0 to
> the TID pointer is a robust thing on the other hand.
Quite. There is no lock; the the futex is used in its purest form, as
a wait queue.
TID = thread is alive
zero = thread is gone
There's no "lock-counter format", because this isn't a lock -- it's a
wakeup. There no need for atomicity either, because the listener only
reads, it doesn't write. I'm not sure if a PROT_SEM word is required
for cache coherency, but if it is, your current implementation requires
one too.
Here's a synchronous thread_join-style waiter; it is architecture-neutral:
while (tid = *tid_address) != 0)
retval = sys_futex (tid_address, FUTEX_WAIT, tid, 0);
-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/