Re: aio-core why not using SuS? [Re: [rfc] aio-core for 2.5.29 (Re: async-io API registration for 2.5.29)]

Jamie Lokier (lk@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:21:33 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] add buddyinfo /proc entry"
Next message: Bhavana Nagendra: "Alloc and lock down large amounts of memory"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] add buddyinfo /proc entry"

Dan Kegel wrote:
> You can actually consider posix AIO using sigtimedwait() to pick up
> completion notices to fit the definition of completion port if you
> squint a bit.

... with the bonus that it fits comfortably into a sigtimedwait() loop
that's waiting for non-AIO things too.

-- Jamie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Greg KH: "Re: [PATCH] add buddyinfo /proc entry"
Next message: Bhavana Nagendra: "Alloc and lock down large amounts of memory"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] add buddyinfo /proc entry"