Good observation, but it's certainly not something for Marcelo to worry
about for 2.4. This is only one of many confusions which would need to
be fixed to get PAGE_CACHE_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE working. mm/shmem.c
is probably especially confused (since it's backing a PAGE_CACHE_SIZE-
orientated filesystem with PAGE_SIZE-orientated swap), but much else too.
I think it was a mistake to introduce the PAGE_CACHE_SIZE definition
before it could be allowed to diverge from PAGE_SIZE: I find it very
hard to work out the right way to go, and would prefer it to vanish.
But Ben LaHaise did succeed in getting a PAGE_CACHE_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE
patch working on 2.4.6 (no patch to mm/shmem.c, but it was a little
different then anyway, right or wrong I don't know).
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/