> > I didn't check the code in detail, but
> > is there really that little that can be shared between
> > the regular mm/ ?
> No, there is actually a lot in common. Probably something
> like 70%. This is really a question of organization.
That's what I guessed on just a cursory glance at the patch.
> I would much prefer to see the non-mmu support in with mm.
> But it would mean a few #ifdef's in there to allow for
> the differences.
Versus massive code duplication, I think the ifdef's would
be a better approach, especially if you can hide them away
in headers.
Dave
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/