Re: 2.5.29: bug in ide and hd kernel option handling
Marcin Dalecki (dalecki@evision.ag)
Thu, 01 Aug 2002 12:14:30 +0200
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, I wrote:
>
>>On my 486 test box (ISA/VLB only, CONFIG_PCI=n), passing any
>>any ide or hd kernel option (like idebus=33) to 2.5.29 results
>>in a kernel hang at boot: I get the initial "Uncompressing ..
>>booting .." and then nothing.
>
>
> Problem partially identified.
>
> With CONFIG_PCI=n, include/asm-i386/ide.h:ide_init_default_hwifs()
> is defined to ide_register_hw() the PC's standard IDE ports, but
> with CONFIG_PCI=y, it's empty.
>
> When drivers/ide/main.c:ide_setup() is called for some "ide..."
> kernel option, it starts by calling init_global_data(), which
> in turn calls ide_init_default_hwifs(). When CONFIG_PCI=n so
> ide_init_default_hwifs() isn't empty, the kernel either hangs
> or reboots at that point.
>
> init_global_data() and ide_init_default_hwifs() can also be called
> much later from 'module_init(init_ata)'. In that case there is no
> hang or reboot -- so my guess is that the initialisation does something
> which normally works but is illegal and causes a fault when done
> at __setup()-time.
>
> I tested every kernel from 2.5.29 and back, and the problem started
> with 2.5.5.
>
> As a workaround I applied the patch below to unconditionally
> make ide_init_default_hwifs() do nothing. This solved my problem
> and doesn't seem to have had any bad side-effects: the kernel still
> finds all standard IDE ports on my 486.
Ahh. Thats actually insightfull. OK some other archs even default to the
same if PCI bus support is enabled at all. I will have to test the
effects of this approach in bochs to see how it lives with "legacy"
host chips. Maybe this whole ide_init_default_hwifs can go completely
away then... (If anything it should be fallback only.)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/