Re: janitorial PATCH: 2.4: nvram.c Lindent

[John Weber]

> If you're doing these kinds of Lindent changes, you might as well also
> fix another non-linuxism:
> 
> 	return (x);	->	return x;
> 
> I don't know why some people seem to think that "return" is a function
> with an argument..

Excuse me?  Anyone care to explain?

> I guess that one isn't mentioned in the CodingStyles thing. I'm lazy.
> Bad Bad Linus.