Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > I don't understand the direction this discussion is taking.
> > >
> > > Either you are trying to output the panic information with minimal
> > > hardware, and in a form a human might be able to decode, in which case
> > > the Morse option seems to me to be the best, or you are trying to
> > > panic in a machine readable format - in which case just dump the data
> > > out /dev/ttyS0 and be done with it!
> > >
> > > To my way of thinking, the idea of the Morse option is that if an oops
> > >
> > > happens when you are not expecting it, and you haven't set up any
> > > equipment to help you, you still have a shot at getting the data.
> >
> >
> > To my way of thinking, this is still 'minimal' -- it's just a different
> > minimum.
> >
> > It's the 'minimum' way to get the panic message out digitally, in such
> > a way that I might be able to recover it using a tape recorder or a
> > telephone. Actually, morse is probably that, but morse loses data and
> > doesn't have any redundancy.
>
> You don't need redundancy. You should just repeat message over and over
> and over and over and....
>
> If you don't want morse to loose data, invent new codes for different
> parenthesis etc.
> Pavel
> --
> Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
> details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/