Re: [patch 2/13] remove pages from the LRU in __free_pages_ok()

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> So when the user's reference is dropped, does that operation kill it
> from the LRU or will the socket's remaining reference to that page
> defer the LRU removal?

That is indeed the question. Right now it will defer, which looks like a
bug. Or at least it is a bug without the interrupt-safe LRU manipulations.

I'm starting to be more convinced about Andrew's alternate patch, the
"move LRU lock innermost and make it irq-safe".

Which also would make it saner to do the LRU handling inside
__put_pages_ok() (and actually remove the BUG_ON(in_interrupt()) that
Andrew had there in the old patch).

		Linus