I thought (intel) CPUs did 48-bit addressing? How do we support 32GiB of
RAM? With pure 32-bit addressing it would be limited to 4GiB only... No?
(Of course I am probably confusing varius types of addresses...)
>Unless you are running a 32bit kernel with a 64bit user space,
>which is simply crazy, unless you are stuck doing it that way.
The code is still broken. The values ARE 64-bit (check the struct
definitions if you don't believe me). This is just a matter of correctness.
It is incorrect as it is right now and it will do Bad Things(tm) if the
supplied values are > 32-bit. (Whether it is possible for a malicious user
to supply them is beyond my knowledge.)
Best regards,
Anton
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown-- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/