when David send you the last rwsem patch he included the bits done by
Brian and me (1) in the description, but not in the patch. This BK
patch adds the missing bits (already reviewed by David).
(1) that is: down_read_trylock/down_write_trylock and the generic
spinlock implementation of write_downgrade.
-- You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to: '| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.===================================================================
ChangeSet@1.477, 2002-07-28 21:18:19+02:00, hch@sb.bsdonline.org Implement down_read_trylock() and down_write_trylock() and add a generic spinlock implementation for downgrade_write().
include/asm-i386/rwsem.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++ include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h | 3 + include/linux/rwsem.h | 25 +++++++++++ lib/rwsem-spinlock.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 4 files changed, 146 insertions, 7 deletions
diff -Nru a/include/asm-i386/rwsem.h b/include/asm-i386/rwsem.h --- a/include/asm-i386/rwsem.h Sun Jul 28 21:19:16 2002 +++ b/include/asm-i386/rwsem.h Sun Jul 28 21:19:16 2002 @@ -118,6 +118,29 @@ } /* + * trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention + */ +static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +{ + __s32 result, tmp; + __asm__ __volatile__( + "# beginning __down_read_trylock\n\t" + " movl %0,%1\n\t" + "1:\n\t" + " movl %1,%2\n\t" + " addl %3,%2\n\t" + " jle 2f\n\t" +LOCK_PREFIX " cmpxchgl %2,%0\n\t" + " jnz 1b\n\t" + "2:\n\t" + "# ending __down_read_trylock\n\t" + : "+m"(sem->count), "=&a"(result), "=&r"(tmp) + : "i"(RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS) + : "memory", "cc"); + return result>=0 ? 1 : 0; +} + +/* * lock for writing */ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) @@ -142,6 +165,19 @@ : "=m"(sem->count), "=d"(tmp) : "a"(sem), "1"(tmp), "m"(sem->count) : "memory", "cc"); +} + +/* + * trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention + */ +static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +{ + signed long ret = cmpxchg(&sem->count, + RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE, + RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS); + if (ret == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE) + return 1; + return 0; } /* diff -Nru a/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h b/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h --- a/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h Sun Jul 28 21:19:16 2002 +++ b/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h Sun Jul 28 21:19:16 2002 @@ -54,9 +54,12 @@ extern void FASTCALL(init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem)); extern void FASTCALL(__down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)); +extern int FASTCALL(__down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)); extern void FASTCALL(__down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)); +extern int FASTCALL(__down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)); extern void FASTCALL(__up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)); extern void FASTCALL(__up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)); +extern void FASTCALL(__downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)); #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif /* _LINUX_RWSEM_SPINLOCK_H */ diff -Nru a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h --- a/include/linux/rwsem.h Sun Jul 28 21:19:16 2002 +++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h Sun Jul 28 21:19:16 2002 @@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ } /* + * trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention + */ +static inline int down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +{ + int ret; + rwsemtrace(sem,"Entering down_read_trylock"); + ret = __down_read_trylock(sem); + rwsemtrace(sem,"Leaving down_read_trylock"); + return ret; +} + +/* * lock for writing */ static inline void down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) @@ -56,6 +68,18 @@ } /* + * trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention + */ +static inline int down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +{ + int ret; + rwsemtrace(sem,"Entering down_write_trylock"); + ret = __down_write_trylock(sem); + rwsemtrace(sem,"Leaving down_write_trylock"); + return ret; +} + +/* * release a read lock */ static inline void up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) @@ -84,7 +108,6 @@ __downgrade_write(sem); rwsemtrace(sem,"Leaving downgrade_write"); } - #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ #endif /* _LINUX_RWSEM_H */ diff -Nru a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c --- a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c Sun Jul 28 21:19:16 2002 +++ b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c Sun Jul 28 21:19:16 2002 @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@ * - the 'waiting count' is non-zero * - the spinlock must be held by the caller * - woken process blocks are discarded from the list after having flags zeroised + * - writers are only woken if wakewrite is non-zero */ -static inline struct rw_semaphore *__rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +static inline struct rw_semaphore *__rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite) { struct rwsem_waiter *waiter; int woken; @@ -56,7 +57,14 @@ waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next,struct rwsem_waiter,list); - /* try to grant a single write lock if there's a writer at the front of the queue + if (!wakewrite) { + if (waiter->flags & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) + goto out; + goto dont_wake_writers; + } + + /* if we are allowed to wake writers try to grant a single write lock if there's a + * writer at the front of the queue * - we leave the 'waiting count' incremented to signify potential contention */ if (waiter->flags & RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) { @@ -68,16 +76,19 @@ } /* grant an infinite number of read locks to the readers at the front of the queue */ + dont_wake_writers: woken = 0; - do { + while (waiter->flags&RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ) { + struct list_head *next = waiter->list.next; + list_del(&waiter->list); waiter->flags = 0; wake_up_process(waiter->task); woken++; if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) break; - waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next,struct rwsem_waiter,list); - } while (waiter->flags&RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ); + waiter = list_entry(next,struct rwsem_waiter,list); + } sem->activity += woken; @@ -149,6 +160,28 @@ } /* + * trylock for reading -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention + */ +int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +{ + int ret = 0; + rwsemtrace(sem,"Entering __down_read_trylock"); + + spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock); + + if (sem->activity>=0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { + /* granted */ + sem->activity++; + ret = 1; + } + + spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock); + + rwsemtrace(sem,"Leaving __down_read_trylock"); + return ret; +} + +/* * get a write lock on the semaphore * - note that we increment the waiting count anyway to indicate an exclusive lock */ @@ -195,6 +228,28 @@ } /* + * trylock for writing -- returns 1 if successful, 0 if contention + */ +int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +{ + int ret = 0; + rwsemtrace(sem,"Entering __down_write_trylock"); + + spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock); + + if (sem->activity==0 && list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { + /* granted */ + sem->activity = -1; + ret = 1; + } + + spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock); + + rwsemtrace(sem,"Leaving __down_write_trylock"); + return ret; +} + +/* * release a read lock on the semaphore */ void __up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem) @@ -222,18 +277,40 @@ sem->activity = 0; if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) - sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem); + sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem, 1); spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock); rwsemtrace(sem,"Leaving __up_write"); } +/* + * downgrade a write lock into a read lock + * - just wake up any readers at the front of the queue + */ +void __downgrade_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem) +{ + rwsemtrace(sem,"Entering __rwsem_downgrade"); + + spin_lock(&sem->wait_lock); + + sem->activity = 1; + if (!list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) + sem = __rwsem_do_wake(sem,0); + + spin_unlock(&sem->wait_lock); + + rwsemtrace(sem,"Leaving __rwsem_downgrade"); +} + EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_rwsem); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_read); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_read_trylock); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_write); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_write_trylock); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up_read); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up_write); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__downgrade_write); #if RWSEM_DEBUG EXPORT_SYMBOL(rwsemtrace); #endif
===================================================================
This BitKeeper patch contains the following changesets: 1.477 ## Wrapped with gzip_uu ##
begin 664 bkpatch9967 M'XL(`+1#1#T``\U9;7,:-Q#^S/T*E8Q=;/,BZ5XA0QK')BU3M_9@IVEG,G,C M[@1<<MS1N\/$+?WO74E@,!P$J#U3;/.BE5:[SZZ>7>%7Z$/*DT9AX`VT5^BG M.,T:A;1;[:9^'(5!Q*MQT@=!)XY!4$OX**[!\/AKA59-#00W+/,&Z)XG::-` MJOKC2/8PXHU"I_7CAZOSCJ8UF^ABP*(^O^49:C:U+$[N6>BG;UDV"..HFB4L M2H<\8U4O'DX?ITXIQA1^3&+KV+2FQ,*&/?6(3P@S"/<Q-1S+T$9L'([3MRD; M=IDP>%6!36VLZQ:E4TRL.M8N$:D:MHTPK6&[1AU$28,X#5(_P[2!,0(PWJZ" M@,X,5,':._2\IE]H'FH/1R$?\BA#?CR)W(0SW\V2AS#VOI1.$(M\-3Y)@HRO M")@/?Z"BSR.>!!Y*1T$DQ"B8ZV19$$>H%R=223]A/E>:2B=5[6=DV(9VLXB- M5MGSH6F88>T-&HFHYT,21%XX]KG*FUHR2?FP.EC`XQ"B&P"/Z1A3W^>^W[5M MG=IUW\0L-Q+;%-K4(750J4^QC1USNV%AT%6K*W/8JMZR7;I)IIA:%IERO^=; M78?;S+,\9O7R[=JL;\DL;-6MW?!BZ;`2Z(Z5!QG&9$HIJ9M3WS%ZV-?K/<NF MON\9VR'+U[DPCQ*=.GN'<^%O3EP-@T[K%C.,'NSB]S!SNG3GN*YI7C+5=BQ; M,LLFYP31O!C.FC^()SP,T[<)]P<LVT&E34UBFA37X2,0DJ0A@M=82-_*0KKU M4C1469`&<MTU*JK-QI[0$#"(2IEK5$DF\A<XX69C2`[@ES:A&%%=0Z=HMJED M,V%:$/51I0)OLW$2I8B@H(?2L>?Q-.V-PS+"8L"+HPQ<`A8$%34M%8SH@8$" M4GC)];649LG8RU`R<<%L-AK$"4>G\/9$^ULKN&ZJ4]@U'8=9&67#T6LQ!JZZ M+BB[CT/8(>2N6](*A>(KU.7]((J$K3D[?8H^944Q#Z%A?!\B^3C"Y2/R*"&- ME4D%-8F4C^B2!$K!?+G^5/(YY&H)[:G1J^N+G]V;3NM]^W<A]X:CK]Z@#ZN/ M:/D(+Z^,_E(K2?=QE"[,>85XY'_#L08JG@V+)7&6WWCQ.,I.RJC8/&;%D@)0 M?4R*)<#Q1,T/BJ7.Q]O6+^[YQ5W[MY;;:9U?NN_:Y[<S^9`/X^2A"`L]KW@" MX*L$F$7D31.C'R`7&@B_UO[1/FFU4\@APT!$GW]<2261T<^:2D\K]=9<2H-^ MQ'T$)[@O-D?->31*QPO(RN!W`0*A4/GPJXA?Z]+][?SJ0ZN,G@AGD'WLM.]: M"C/`!TPO2>7-7!4"UAF$9($FH+=,KOFDO"/%_I=:\3SZ;0S-GU-W',FZZZW? M-TCWY3A7='"[LNUL<*F)$_PKZ^`&_LT'YA`6-BU$-/XUXY`:(M7?G]_>79Q? M797VHD_(QK9I;]>TX^F1JNH+5?=QX*_J6FYWMRG:D.B'Y/>NK>W6_B&WLUTT M#[JNF@=GSS2F<(4A+YC'ZUF<VS'(SOS;"7M8GAH.(O3EFH4]6P6Q!'84K"I< M`J`]+FIAN=B"C1)ATYK&>4F#6I![MD!UCKXKSNZWJE,5,EO41#,/J>>KA?M6 MPEVA>J)R':N5'7<`*U?A*EJ7CF`MP1-YM[QOT,3A%\W_II5.3<?2+<D5=$^N M<*#F6?^;>T9NY1,WZ14:R</D4!811Z,B#P1/4L0@5P&?!S2)O_!(G(`)^\*E M%`4IBN*H\A=/8NW2Q+"T+9^?'HK<['==:2YXYPI]&X](69ZIQRU/8)^ZW*>. M'-7@?;<0(CA.<FS"A/&5-[V0]5-T/.O^/IZW[]J__NB^O^ZH1E$T@(5^G,4H M'HL#J-Y#.F32*'>&`4C$:2C43J7[7&+"PA#JF`]Y(JU[Q`L")\8@8F`W0RD< MMW`F1>H;JA[*!CSAWP.V6@&P5BL1R\0XZB6P/8KE)/3GF(^YUK8%J.MV-;1+ MFPHPX%G7"I,!W+Y6?#]>]US<*A12,\S#(,W<`60B.HV@IP!*F:L0DJH8>PWN M7]IU1+6V`Y=26*NFH*9:#2F=/)3$S/)C($5TU:RRF',B46P3DR#Z;'7JH&OL MC'#!=KR-='/T"I*$/!!'S)7[J+N*\%)^5F*1@'*<>5EP'V0/XF9V?#Q#:CC* M'IZL$]BH>$!^R;2!K`+?(#[+2L[.7JOK"MA-YADI+1E'FVW95``V.)=;+TG= MS@G9H07SL.OB?C%;JVP'!*WY'$$#>ROD!>*V6^FFU!3LH%ZD9;)=6"%>P;%$ M7"JH3A"IS[XG>*PZP&'+Y!4!MS%Y7N6`JA6?QZGB:#0>(18]2+DL'ALY38`E M;RY[7%A$(FP)_=ROF;;=XKX:+C+[VN"[;8'?"B9>VO>P$.<X(D(*`=(AD*W? M;ZX[=^[M'[^\N\Z]A:I8&INF/LD=-=?:,'<I*N*R./\?ES?@WI=T/&Q:O&<[ -W/.T?P%XL2Z'3AL````` ` end - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/