> Linus,
>
> Following from previous patch which introduced PAGE_CACHE_MASK_LL, this
> one fixes a bug in fs/ntfs/dir.c which was using PAGE_CACHE_MASK
> on 64-bit values... It now uses PAGE_CACHE_MASK_LL.
>
> Patch together with the other two patches available from:
>
> bk pull http://linux-ntfs.bkbits.net/linux-2.5-pm
>
> Best regards,
>
> Anton
> --
> Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @)
> Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net
> WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/, http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
>
> ===================================================================
>
> This will update the following files:
>
> fs/ntfs/dir.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> through these ChangeSets:
>
> <aia21@cantab.net> (02/07/27 1.479)
> fs/ntfs/dir.c: Use PAGE_CACHE_MASK_LL() on 64-bit values.
>
>
> diff -Nru a/fs/ntfs/dir.c b/fs/ntfs/dir.c
> --- a/fs/ntfs/dir.c Sat Jul 27 14:24:09 2002
> +++ b/fs/ntfs/dir.c Sat Jul 27 14:24:09 2002
> @@ -1232,7 +1232,8 @@
> ntfs_debug("Handling index buffer 0x%Lx.",
> (long long)bmp_pos + cur_bmp_pos);
> /* If the current index buffer is in the same page we reuse the page. */
>
> - if ((prev_ia_pos & PAGE_CACHE_MASK) != (ia_pos & PAGE_CACHE_MASK)) {
> + if ((prev_ia_pos & PAGE_CACHE_MASK_LL) !=
> + (ia_pos & PAGE_CACHE_MASK_LL)) {
> prev_ia_pos = ia_pos;
> if (likely(ia_page != NULL))
> ntfs_unmap_page(ia_page);
Hmm. Wouldn't
prev_ia_pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT != ia_pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
work just as well? And be some safer as the result could be stored in
32bits?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/