Re: [Jfs-discussion] Re: 2.5.27: Software Suspend failure / JFS errors

Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:06:57 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?"
Previous message: Olaf Kirch: "Re: [NFS] Locking patches (generic & nfs)"
In reply to: Dave Kleikamp: "Re: 2.5.27: Software Suspend failure / JFS errors"
Next in thread: axel@hh59.org: "Re: JFS errors"

On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 09:54:35AM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Sunday 21 July 2002 09:42, axel@hh59.org wrote:
> > This oops occurred during build of gcc..
> > Kernel 2.4.19-rc2-ac2.
> > About the same happens with 2.5.27. I will post an oops of jfsCommit
> > of 2.5.27 as soon as I get one.
>
> I just built gcc on 2.4.19-rc3 + latest JFS and didn't have a problem.
> I'll repeat it on 2.4.19-rc2-ac2, but there shouldn't be more than a
> comsmetic difference in the JFS code. I haven't tried 2.5.27 yet.

As I read 'Software Suspend' in the subject I guess it's swsusp fault.
Swsusp needs magic flags for kernel threads which no one has added to
JFS yet.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: is flock broken in 2.4 or 2.5 kernels or what does this mean?"
Previous message: Olaf Kirch: "Re: [NFS] Locking patches (generic & nfs)"
In reply to: Dave Kleikamp: "Re: 2.5.27: Software Suspend failure / JFS errors"
Next in thread: axel@hh59.org: "Re: JFS errors"