Gratuitous 'cleanups' with no real redeeming feature also have another
downside which a lot of people seem to overlook. They completely screws
over anyone who also has a pending patch in that area if Linus applies it.
For most people this is five minutes work as they fix up by hand
the single reject in one or two places. For people like myself keeping
a large patchset, this is a lot of extra work for absolutely no gain.
Two kernels later, someone adds a new sysctl which re-adds the , at
the end anyway.
We have much bigger problems to fix than silly[1] things like this.
Dave
[1] Maybe silly is the wrong word to use, but I didn't want to use
'trivial' for fear of putting down the usefulness of Rusty's
trivial patches.
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/