Re: [PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2

Marcin Dalecki (dalecki@evision.ag)
Mon, 22 Jul 2002 20:06:22 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] big IRQ lock removal, 2.5.27-E0"
Previous message: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.27 devfs"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Dike: "[PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2"

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 12:15:29PM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
>>include/linux/linkage.h -
>> UML needs FASTCALL defined as regparm(3), too.
>
>
> The fastcall definition should go into an asm/ header instead of such hacks..
>
> the disk accounting stuff is also bogus - instead of wasting ram with
> huge array it should rather be dynamically-allocated in a per-disk
> structure..

... which the name of is: struct genpart.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ingo Molnar: "[patch] big IRQ lock removal, 2.5.27-E0"
Previous message: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: [PATCH] 2.5.27 devfs"
Maybe in reply to: Jeff Dike: "[PATCH] UML - part 1 of 2"