> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Since I know spit about IDE/ATA/ATAPI/SCSI, I'll keep my mouth shut and
> > leave judgement/"voting" to those who fully understand the technical issues.
>
> You probably shouldn't. Technical decisions should be made by technicians,
> but decisions about the technicians should be made by the human resources
> dept., and since we claim to be a constitutional monarchy, we might try
> out a democratic decision...
I usually don't use words like this, but can you just shut up?
I mean - if Bartek, or me, or whoever, wanted to be the 2.5 IDE king
now, I'm sure Martin would pass the thorny crown quite happily.
When noone else says that, I'm very impressed about where the IDE code
got from before Martin started. And after talking to him at the Kernel
Workshop I must say he has a very good vision where he's heading to.
The only problem that pisses of a lot of people is that he just spews
patches at his own rate, not synchronized with Linus, so that Martin's
latest 'stable' doesn't usually match Linus's releases.
Now that the most aggresive changes are behind us, I believe things will
go a tad smoother ...
Anyway, I guess I should just shut up and go back to fixing that SiS IDE
driver, too ...
-- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/