Re: [PATCH] for_each_pgdat

[William Lee Irwin III]

At some point in the past, Robert Love wrote:
>> If Bill wants to convert pgdats to lists that is fine but is another
>> step.  Let's get in this first batch and that can be done off this.

On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 03:48:59PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> As we now reference them in only two places (the macro defn and
> numa.c:_alloc_pages) it hardly seems worth converting to lists ... ? 
> (I'm going to take an axe to NUMA _alloc_pages in a minute anyway ;-))

I won't stand in the way of any of this, the list.h sort-of suggestion
was merely part of questioning the pgdat_next change. In fact, it was
meant more to point out what you just did, that the iterator takes the
field out of direct usage except for a couple of places.

I'll stand behind these changes as they are now.

Cheers,
Bill